New Haven · Membership and death references
South Congregational Church history and catalogue, 1852–1865 · scan page 150
Uncorrected OCR. Name spellings, dates, symbols and column order may be wrong. Verify against the original scan. Includes an alphabetical past-member list, death dates and explanations of death and dismissal symbols. Also contains sermons and church history. A dismissal to another church is not a death.
Searchable source text
140 THE EX-PARTE COUNCIL, the same purpose, aside from the contributions of one indi- vidual ; and that if those who are friendly to their object will provide them with a suitable buikling, the petitioners will have no occasion to depend upon the contributions of the old and wealthy Churches. Whether in view of the foregoing facts the complainants were wrong in asking to be heard in the Church ; and when tliat was forbidden, in a private conference ; and when that was declined, in seeking for a Mutual Council; and when that was denied, in calling for an Ex-parte Coun- cil— the public will determine. In behalf of the Petitioners. SOUTH CHURCH,— AGAIN. Remarks on the "Rejoinder." Messrs. Editors : — As the Standing Committee of the South Church have not seen lit to reply to the " Rejoinder" of the petitioners for an Ex-parte Council, and as the peti- tioners miglit deem themselves slighted if their production was wholly passed over in silence, permit a member of said Church, not belonging to the Standing Committee, to oifer a few words by way of comment. He will be best under- stood liy quoting brief extracts from the " R(*joinder," and then adding his own remarks. The petitioners say : " On consulting as to the best moans of providing ;i place of worship more congenial to their views of duty, they were advised that a Coun- cil convened to form a new Church, would have, as'one of its first duties, to inquire into the reasons for their leaving the South Church." So this Ex parte Council was itself the result of counsel ; and, although called ostensibly to consider the expediency of forming a new Church, was mainly designed, at least l)y the "advisers," for another purpose, viz : to get a dig at the South Church. [We had no doul)t that such was the fact, but did not expect the petitioners to confess it.] Accordingly the discussion and finding of the Council in re- gard to tlie South Churcii occupy almost the whole extent of their " Result," as given to the public, while in regard to
Cite this page
Silent Grounds Collective, Church Burial & Death Records, CH-P004-0150. South Congregational Church history and catalogue, 1852–1865, printed page not verified, PDF page 150. Hallock, Gerard, 1800-1866; digitized copy contributed by University of California Libraries https://archive.org/details/historyofsouthco00hall/page/n154/mode/1up Accessed September 8, 2026.
Historic U.S. publication before 1931; public-domain assessment based on publication date. Internet Archive does not necessarily provide an explicit license. Preserve publication and digitizing credits.
