The commission’s narrative describes the earlier county-home plan, a 1913 naming change, and the subsequent adoption of Cedarcrest as a distinctive institutional name.
Evidence, credit & reuse: Public domain in the United States: original work published before 1931. The page starts mid-sentence from the preceding page. Its 1913 account takes precedence here over conflicting secondary summaries that give 1912. Cropped from the source page.
Source: Connecticut State Tuberculosis Commission, Report for July 1, 1924–June 30, 1926, printed p. 16; Internet Archive.

Searchable text & research notes
Included OCR or searchable notes appear below and in the download. Use your browser’s Find command to search this page. OCR errors and historical language are retained.
Read the included text
Uncorrected OCR of the full source page; the displayed asset may be a crop. 16 NARRATIVE toria, was an enumeration of the cases of tuberculosis that were then in the almshouses and county homes of the state. It was urged that the counties assisted by the state should provide "homes" in which these unfortunate victims of tuberculosis could be quarantined. The county authorities, however, were lukewarm or hostile to the plan. The State was obliged to shoulder the entire expense of the establish- ment of the proposed institutions. In the first statutes, the institutions were still referred to as "county homes," and the expectation still appeared that there would be a tubercu- losis "home" in every county in the state. Experience soon demonstrated that the county idea was unwise. The General Assembly of 1913 changed the names of the institutions to "state sanatoria." This helped a great deal, Connecticut's State Sanatoria soon faced the critical public and challenged comparison with the best of state sanatoria anywhere. Then came years of enlargement and development. The fame of the State Sanatoria of Connecticut spread. The national leaders of the anti-tuberculosis movement began to realize that at the Connecticut Sanatoria many of the administrative and scientific problems of tuberculosis con- trol were being solved in new and admirable ways. The great national and international publications devoted to tuberculosis began to contain reports of the papers read at the monthly conferences of the medical officers of the Connecticut State Sanatoria. It became apparent that not only were Connecticut's sanatoria in the front rank of state sanatoria, but that, with the single exception of their cheaper wooden buildings they were comparable with the most richly endowed private sanatoria, or the most famous national sanatoria. It seemed desirable for the psycho- logical reasons given in our report to the last General Assembly, to individualize the various sanatoria with dis- tinctive names. Therefore, the sanatorium at Hartford is now, Cedarcrest. The approach to this institution is by way of a well paved driveway from the State road a couple of miles south of Hartford. The superintendent of Cedarcrest is Dr. William M. Stockwell who has been in the service of the State as sanatorium superintendent since 1910. He is a native of Connecticut and a graduate of the University of Pennsyl- vania. His two capable assistants are Dr. Neil K. Forhan, formerly of the staff of the National Government's tubercu- losis sanatorium at Allingtown and Dr. Max Teplitz, for-
Cite this item
Silent Grounds Collective, Cedarcrest Hospital, SGC-CEDARCREST-025, CEDARCREST-003, “Why the state sanatorium became Cedarcrest.” Source: Connecticut State Tuberculosis Commission, Report for July 1, 1924–June 30, 1926, printed p. 16; Internet Archive.. https://archive.org/details/report19241926connuoft/page/n19/mode/1up. Research edition, accessed 2026-09-08.
